一审_blank class=infotextkey>原_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>告诉称_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>201_blank class=infotextkey>4年_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2月,李爱民告状至_blank class=infotextkey>原审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院称:_blank class=infotextkey>位于61_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2号衡宇(以_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>下简称_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇)_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系我于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2001年所购置。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>200_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>6年9月,经伴侣先容,我赞成冯振庭暂_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>住_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇。现我无_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>其他固_blank class=infotextkey>定_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>住所,但冯振庭拒_blank class=infotextkey>不腾_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>退_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇,故我诉至_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院,请求判令冯振庭将_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>返还李爱民,并由冯振庭负担本案_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>诉讼费。一审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>被告辩称冯振庭辩称:1、李爱民与我之间_blank class=infotextkey>原是情_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>我们两边配_blank class=infotextkey>合出资购置,筹办用作婚_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2、李爱民该当根据我的出资所占_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>购_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房款的_blank class=infotextkey>比例,参考_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>今朝_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>市场_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>价值,赐与我响应的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>赔偿。因此,我_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>差别意李爱民的诉讼请求。一审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院查明_blank class=infotextkey>原审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院经审理查明:1_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>999年_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>1_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2月_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>1_blank class=infotextkey>3日,李爱民与_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>北京市民族_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>事件委员_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>会_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>签署《_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>公_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>住宅_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>楼_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房生意_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>合同书》。两边约_blank class=infotextkey>定,依据向职工_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>出售_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>公_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>住宅的相干文件,李爱民以44668元的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>代价购置_blank class=infotextkey>位于61_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2号衡宇。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2000年_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>1_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2月_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>25日,李爱民向售_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>单元交纳了_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>分期付款_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>剩余_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房款_blank class=infotextkey>357_blank class=infotextkey>35元、利钱1479元。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2001年,李爱民取得_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>全_blank class=infotextkey>部权证。李爱民自_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2008年起_blank class=infotextkey>不在_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇内现实栖_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>身。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>今朝,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇由冯振庭现实栖_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>身,但李爱民、冯振庭两边均_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房门_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>钥匙。另查,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>20_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>1_blank class=infotextkey>3年6月,李爱民向_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>北京市_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>东_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>城区_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院提起_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>返还_blank class=infotextkey>原物_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>纠纷一案,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>要求冯振庭腾_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>退_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇。因冯振庭于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>20_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>1_blank class=infotextkey>3年_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>1_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2月就_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇向_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>北京市_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>东_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>城区_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院提起_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>共_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有权确认_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>纠纷一案,李爱民撤_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>回了该案的告状。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>201_blank class=infotextkey>4年1月,冯振庭撤_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>回了_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>共_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有权确认_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>纠纷一案的告状。庭审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>中,李爱民称李爱民、冯振庭两边于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上世纪_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>八_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>十年月_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>了解,后于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>200_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>6年确_blank class=infotextkey>定_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>爱情_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>200_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>6年9月,冯振庭现实入_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>住_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2008年4月,李爱民、冯振庭两边因糊口抵牾导致_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系分裂,李爱民遂搬离_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇。后经李爱民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>多次敦促,冯振庭拒_blank class=infotextkey>不_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>返还_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇并现实占用至_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>今。冯振庭则称,李爱民、冯振庭两边自1_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>99_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>5年确_blank class=infotextkey>定_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>爱情_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系后,冯振庭就现实栖_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>身于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇。1_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>999年,李爱民、冯振庭两边配_blank class=infotextkey>合出资,以李爱民名义向李爱民的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>单元购置了_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇,筹办_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>作为婚_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>使用。后因李爱民的缘故_blank class=infotextkey>原由,两边_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系分裂,但冯振庭尚未搬离_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>内的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>物品_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>问题,李爱民称_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇内除冯振庭的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>小我私家随_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>身_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>物品外,其余_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>家具、电器均_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系李爱民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>全_blank class=infotextkey>部。冯振庭虽称_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>内的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>物品_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系冯振庭_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>全_blank class=infotextkey>部,但并未_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>提供相干证据支撑其主。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>购_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房款出资_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>问题,李爱民称_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇由其自行出资购置。冯振庭则称,其别离于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2000年1月4日向李爱民汇款_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2000元,于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2000年_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>1_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2月_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>19日向李爱民汇款_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>万元_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>作为_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>购_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房款。就此,李爱民承认_blank class=infotextkey>收到冯振庭所称汇款,但称_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2000元_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>金钱的性_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>子_blank class=infotextkey>不_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>清晰,另_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>万元是李爱民向冯振庭的乞贷,李爱民后已归还冯振庭该乞贷。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>装_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>修_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>问题,李爱民称_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇由李爱民出资_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>装_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>修。冯振庭则称其于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>200_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>6年8月_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>30日向李爱民汇款4_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>万元_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>作为_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>装_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>修款,由李爱民找_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>举行_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>装_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>修。就此,李爱民承认_blank class=infotextkey>收到冯振庭的4_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>万元汇款,但称该_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>金钱_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>并非_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>装_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>修款,而是冯振庭因旅途未便携带而_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>通过李爱民的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>银行账户_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>举行周转,该_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>金钱已由冯振庭取出后自行购置_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>基_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>金。李爱民未_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>提供相干证据_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>证实其所称的已归还冯振庭_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>2_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>万元乞贷_blank class=infotextkey>以及冯振庭已经取走4_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>万元_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>金钱的事宜,冯振庭亦未_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>提供相干证据_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>证实_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上述_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>金钱的汇款目的及用途。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>关于冯振庭所主的李爱民该当根据冯振庭出资所占_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>购_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房款的_blank class=infotextkey>比例,参考_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>今朝_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>市场_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>价值,赐与冯振庭响应的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>赔偿一节,经本院释明,冯振庭未在本院指_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>定的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>时_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>代内向本院提交其已主权力的相干证据。
_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上述事实,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>全_blank class=infotextkey>部权证,《_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>公_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>住宅_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>楼_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房生意_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>合同书》_blank class=infotextkey>以及当事_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人的陈述等证据质料在案佐证。一审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院认为_blank class=infotextkey>原审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院经审理认为:无权_blank class=infotextkey>占据动产或者_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>不动产的,权力_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>可以请求_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>返还_blank class=infotextkey>原物。本案_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>中,李爱民是_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>挂号_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>全_blank class=infotextkey>部权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人,其_blank class=infotextkey>依法对_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇享_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>占据、_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>使用、_blank class=infotextkey>收益和处分的权力。因冯振庭未_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>提供相干证据_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>证实其_blank class=infotextkey>占据_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>存在正当依据,故李爱民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>要求冯振庭_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>返还_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇,于法_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有据,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院予以支撑。至于冯振庭所称其曾与李爱民配_blank class=infotextkey>合出资_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>购_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房及李爱民该当赐与冯振庭_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>赔偿一节,冯振庭可_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>通过_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>其他正当途径另行主,本案_blank class=infotextkey>不予_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>处置惩罚。综_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>集_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>体_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>子_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>优缺点,_blank class=infotextkey>原审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院于_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>201_blank class=infotextkey>4年5月讯断:冯振庭于讯断生效后两个月内将六一二号衡宇交还李爱民。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上诉_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人诉称讯断后,冯振庭_blank class=infotextkey>不平,提出_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上诉,请求打消_blank class=infotextkey>原审讯决,_blank class=infotextkey>依法_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>改判。其首要_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上诉来由为:_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系我与李爱民配_blank class=infotextkey>合出资购置,而且我对衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>举行了_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>装_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>修,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>付出了_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>装_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>修用度,_blank class=infotextkey>原审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>没_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有确认相干事实;基于配_blank class=infotextkey>合出资购置_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇的事实,李爱民该当根据_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>市场_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>代价依照出资_blank class=infotextkey>比例_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>补偿我的丧失。李爱民赞成_blank class=infotextkey>原审讯决。本院查明本院经审理查明的事实与_blank class=infotextkey>原审_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>法院查明的事实无_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>异,本院予以确认。
本院认为本院认为:_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>全_blank class=infotextkey>部权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人对本_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>身的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>不动产或者动产,_blank class=infotextkey>依法享_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>占据、_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>使用、_blank class=infotextkey>收益和处分的权力。无权_blank class=infotextkey>占据_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>不动产或者动产的,权力_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>可以请求_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>返还_blank class=infotextkey>原物。_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>按照现已查明的事实,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>原_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>北京_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>市民族_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>事件委员_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>会向职工_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>出售的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>公_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>住宅,_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>深圳_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>小_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>产权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房绿本,后李爱民与_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>北京_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>市民族_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>事件委员_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>会_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>签署了_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>购_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>房_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>合同并取得了_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>全_blank class=infotextkey>部权。现李爱民_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>作为_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>挂号的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>全_blank class=infotextkey>部权_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>要求冯振庭_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>返还_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇,于法_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>有据,应予支撑。冯振庭主_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>系两边配_blank class=infotextkey>合出资购置,李爱民该当根据出资_blank class=infotextkey>比例_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>补偿其丧失的_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上诉_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>意见,因其_blank class=infotextkey>不属于正当_blank class=infotextkey>占据_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>涉诉衡宇的前提,故本院_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>难以支撑,冯振庭可另行主。
综_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上所述,依照《_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>中华_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>人民_blank class=infotextkey>共和国民事诉讼法》_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>第一百七_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>十条_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>_blank class=infotextkey>第一款_blank class=infotextkey>第(一)项之划_blank class=infotextkey>定,本院讯断如_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>下:二审裁判_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>成果维持_blank class=infotextkey>原判,驳_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>回_blank class=infotextkey>get=_blank class=infotextkey>上诉。